Evaluation of the effectiveness of civil defense measures in the elaboration of management decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33408/2519-237X.2021.5-2.241Keywords:
civil defense, efficiency assessment, civil defense management bodies, system, operation, efficiency, uncertainty, management decision makingAbstract
Purpose. Develop an approach to formalize the assessment of the effectiveness of civil defense measures in the preparation of management decisions.
Methods. The well-known methods of efficiency theory, theory of operations research, probability theory and mathematical statistics, as well as general scientific methods (induction, deduction, analysis and synthesis) were used as a theoretical basis.
Findings. The analysis of the main literary sources in the field of assessing the effectiveness of complex systems. An approach has been developed to formalize the assessment of the effectiveness of civil defense measures in the preparation of management decisions based on the criterion for assessing the quality of the operation results.
Application field of research. The research results can be used in scientific research related to aspects of preparation and conduct of civil defense, as well as in the practical activities of chiefs and staffs of civil defense.
References
Kolmogorov A.N. Chislo popadaniy pri neskol'kikh vystrelakh i obshchie printsipy otsenki ef-fektivnosti sistemy strel'by [The number of hits with multiple shots and general principles for assessing the effectiveness of the firing system]. Proceedings of the Steklov Mathematical Institute: collection of articles on the theory of artillery fire. Moscow, Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1945. Pp. 7–25. (rus)
Ventcel' E.S. Vvedenie v issledovanie operatsiy [Introduction to operations research]. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio, 1964. 390 p. (rus)
Dobrov A.V. Osnovy teorii effektivnosti [Fundamentals of efficiency theory]: tutorial. Himki: Civil Defence Academy of Emercom of Russia, 2009. 136 p. (rus)
Petukhov G.B. Osnovy teorii effektivnosti tselenapravlennykh protsessov. Chast' 1 Metodologiya, metody, modeli [Fundamentals of the theory of the effectiveness of purposeful processes. Part 1 Methodology, methods, models]. Leningrad: Ministry of Defense of the USSR, 1989. 647 p. (rus)
Petukhov G.B., Yakunin V.I. Metodologicheskie osnovy vneshnego proektirovaniya tselenapravlennykh protsessov i tseleustremlennykh sistem [Methodological bases of external design of purposeful processes and purposeful systems]. Moscow: AST, 2006. 502 p. (rus)
Vinogradov V.A. Effektivnost' slozhnykh sistem. Dinamicheskie modeli [Effectiveness of complex systems. Dynamic models]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. 288 p. (rus)
Habayeb A.R. Systems effectiveness. Irbid; Yarmouk University: Pergamon press, 1989. 447 p. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-11076-0.
Morse P.M., Kimball G.E. Methods of operations research. Washington: National Defense Research Committee, 1946. 186 р.
Anureev I.I. Primenenie matematicheskikh metodov v voennom dele [Application of mathematical methods in military affairs]. Moscow: Voenizdat, 1972. 254 p. (rus)
Zotov V.P. Teoreticheskie osnovy otsenki effektivnosti [Theoretical foundations of performance assessment]. Moscow: Military Academy named after F.E. Dzerzhinsky, 1969. 452 р. (rus)
Bordak S.S., Subbotin M.N. Podgotovka meropriyatiy grazhdanskoy oborony na osnove analiza riskov [Preparation of actions of civil defense on the basis of risk analysis]. Journal of Civil Protection, 2017. Vol. 1, No. 2. Pp. 223–231. (rus) DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.33408/2519-237X.2017.1-2.223.
Subbotin M.N., Bordak S.S. Meropriyatiya grazhdanskoy zashchity, obespechivayushchie zhivuchest' goroda v mirnoe i voennoe vremya [Measures of the Civil Defense providing the functioning of cities at peace and war period]. Vestnik Komandno-inzhenernogo instituta MChS Respubliki Belarus', 2016. No. 1 (23). Pp. 99–105. (rus)
Tikhonov M.M., Subbotin, M.N., Bordak, S.S. Perspektivy sozdaniya gosudarstvennoy sistemy grazhdanskoy zashchity [Perspectives of the creation of the state system of civil protection]. Journal of Civil Protection, 2018. Vol. 2. No. 3. Pp. 386–392. (rus). DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.33408/2519-237X.2018.2-3.386.
Lasuta G.F., Karpilenya N.V., Bulva A.D. Metodika ranzhirovaniya organizatsiy v interesakh grazhdanskoy oborony s ispol'zovaniem metoda analiza ierarkhiy [Ranking methodology of organizations for benefit of civil defense using the method of hierarchies]. Journal of Civil Protection, 2019. Vol. 3, No. 3. Pp. 301–313. (rus). DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.33408/2519-237X.2019.3-3.301.
Beshelev S.D., Gurvich F.G. Ekspertnye otsenki [Expert assessments]. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. 161 p. (rus)
Borisov N.N., Levchenko A.S. Metody otsenki resheniy: elementy analiza [Decision Evaluation Techniques: Elements of Analysis]. Riga: RPI, 1980. 189 p. (rus)
Kuz'menko Yu.M. [et al.]. Metody analiza i obrabotki voenno-ekonomicheskoy informatsii [Methods of analysis and processing of military-economic information]. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 115 p. (rus)
Thurstone L.L. The Measurement of Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959. 322 р.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Bordak S.S., Kovtun V.A., Pleskachevskiy Yu.M.
CC «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0
